HAIRSTYLES

How to Spot Fake Reviews of Beauty and Hair Clinics

A new colourist, a laser studio for those stubborn chin hairs, a clinic that promises to do something about the thinning at your parting. Most of us now pick these places the same way: we type the name into Google, glance at the stars and read three or four reviews. It feels like asking a friend. The trouble is that some of those “friends” were paid, prompted or invented.

This is not paranoia. In 2021, consumer authorities in 26 EU countries, plus Iceland and Norway, checked 223 large websites that show customer reviews. For 144 of them they could not confirm the sites were doing enough to make sure reviews came from real customers. In the UK, posting or commissioning fake reviews has been explicitly banned since April 2025, and the Competition and Markets Authority has published guidance on fake reviews for businesses. Laws help, but they do not read the reviews for you.

Here is what to look for before you book anything that involves your hair, your skin or a needle.

Why beauty and hair clinics are a soft target

Treatments are personal, results take time and almost nobody posts a photo of a disappointing result. A haircut you dislike grows out in six weeks. A hair transplant or a course of PRP injections is judged after a year, by which point few people go back to update a review.

Clinics know that a 4.9 rating converts better than a 4.4, and the difference between the two can be a few dozen reviews. Some ask only their happiest clients to write one. Some offer a discount on the next visit in exchange. A few simply buy them.

Seven warning signs

1. A burst of reviews in a short window. Scroll to the oldest reviews and look at the dates. A clinic that collected ten reviews in three years and then forty in a fortnight did not suddenly become forty times better.

2. Reviewers with one review to their name. Tap on the profile. Real people tend to review a restaurant, a plumber, a hotel. An account that exists only to praise one beauty clinic is worth less than one that has a history.

3. Praise with no details. “Amazing team, highly recommend, best clinic ever!” could be written about anything. Genuine reviews mention things you could only know by going: the wait in reception, the name of the nurse, how long the redness lasted, what the final bill came to.

4. The same phrases again and again. If several reviews repeat the same unusual wording (“life-changing natural result”, “true artists of hair”), they were probably written from the same template. Sometimes the identical text turns up on another clinic’s page too.

5. Everyone mentions the same staff member in the same way. Happy clients name people. But when twenty reviews all praise “Dr X and the wonderful team” in near-identical sentences, someone may have handed out a script.

6. No middle ground. Real ratings are messy: mostly good, some three-star “fine but expensive” comments, the odd complaint about parking. A profile with only five-star raves and a handful of furious one-stars that the clinic answers aggressively is a pattern worth noting.

7. Results described too early. “Two weeks after my transplant and the result is perfect!” Nobody knows the result of a hair transplant at two weeks. Transplanted hair usually sheds first and grows back over many months. Reviews like this measure the welcome, not the outcome.

What a useful review looks like

Look for the review that tells you something you can check. It names the treatment, says roughly when it happened, mentions the price or whether it matched the quote, and describes the aftercare. For hair loss treatments, the most valuable reviews are the ones written months later, ideally with an honest line about what did not go to plan.

Read the negative reviews properly, too. One bad review is not a red flag. What matters is the clinic’s reply. A calm answer that explains and offers to talk is a good sign. A reply that attacks the patient or reveals their medical details is not.

Cross-check, do not trust one site

The simplest protection is to compare sources. A clinic with a 4.9 on Google, a 3.8 on a booking platform and a string of complaints on a forum is telling you something. Platforms that only let people review after a booked appointment, such as the “verified appointment” label on Doctoralia in Spain, carry more weight than open ones.

It also helps to look at how a comparison site turns reviews into a ranking. A rating out of five based on six reviews should not sit above one based on six hundred. If you are considering a hair clinic in Spain, it is worth reading how ComparaCapilar ranks clinics (in Spanish): the order of its “best rated” list comes from a published formula that weighs the average Google rating against the number of reviews, clinics cannot pay for a position, and its clinic pages flag the same patterns described above, such as clusters of one-review accounts or many reviews posted within two weeks.

Before you book

  • Read the oldest reviews and the most recent ones, not just the top three.
  • Search the clinic’s name plus “complaint” or “problem”.
  • Ask at the consultation who will actually perform the treatment, and whether you can see results from that person.
  • Get the price in writing. A review saying “cheaper than expected” means nothing without a quote to compare.
  • Trust your own visit. A clinic that pressures you to pay a deposit on the day deserves more doubt than any review.

Stars are a starting point. The details behind them, and the questions you ask in person, are what keep you from paying for someone else’s marketing budget.

Comments Off on How to Spot Fake Reviews of Beauty and Hair Clinics